Top 5 challenges in E-Waste collection and how to overcome them

E-waste refers to various forms of electrical and electronic equipment that have lost their purpose for human use and are considered unneeded. No doubt, it is one of the fastest-growing solid waste streams in the world, especially when living in a consumerist and throwaway society. Since it contains toxic materials, improper disposal can lead to the release of harmful emissions, affecting both the environment and human health. The least we can do is follow the e-waste hierarchy:  reuse, recycle and recover. To achieve this, we must properly collect e-waste to prevent illegal dumping. In this blog, we will discuss common challenges in e-waste collection and explore potential solutions to these problems.

What is e-waste According to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive*:

*Directive 2012/19/EU, Annex III

5 Reasons why collecting E-Waste is problematic

1. Technological Complexity & Rapid Innovation

The rapid pace of technological advancement creates challenges for both processing and e-waste collection. As newer devices emerge, traditional collection systems struggle to keep up, leading to several key issues:

  • Faster disposal cycles: New electronic products are released frequently, but collection methods might not evolve at the same rate.
  • Increasing complexity of devices: Many e-waste bins and recycling centers cannot process certain electronics due to their smaller size, intricate designs, or advanced materials.
  • Inbuilt, non-removable components: Devices with embedded batteries or soldered parts are difficult to classify and separate during collection.
  • Mixed-material construction: Many modern devices combine plastic, metal, and glass, requiring specialized sorting technologies before recycling can even begin.
  • Miniaturization and hidden e-waste: Electronic components are increasingly embedded in everyday objects, making them hard to identify as e-waste. As a result, many people unknowingly dispose of them in regular trash rather than designated collection points.

2. Lack of Public Awareness and Collection Infrastructure

One of the biggest challenges in e-waste collection is the lack of public awareness about what qualifies as e-waste and where to dispose of it properly. Many consumers either do not recognize certain items as electronic waste or are unaware of the proper collection methods, leading to improper disposal practices such as illegal dumping, hoarding, or discarding e-waste with regular household trash.

Even when people understand what e-waste is, they often struggle to find proper disposal sites. Some key issues include:

  • Lack of visible or accessible collection points
  • Unclear regulations and collection schedules

One effective method of e-waste collection is retailer take-back programs, where electronics retailers or manufacturers accept old devices from consumers for proper disposal or recycling. Many major electronics brands and retailers already offer these programs, making it easier for consumers to return old devices. However, increasing public awareness and accessibility remains essential. 

3. Legislation

E-waste collection methods differ across countries due to variations in legislation, infrastructure, and enforcement. While some nations have established regulations ensuring proper e-waste management, others still lack formal systems. The Global E-waste Statistics Framework categorizes e-waste collection into four main routes, each reflecting different regulatory and infrastructural conditions:

Source: https://ewastemonitor.info/the-global-e-waste-monitor-2024/

Route 1: E-waste is gathered through official programs, such as government-backed or private initiatives, and delivered to authorized recycling facilities. These facilities employ advanced technologies to safely extract valuable materials while minimizing environmental harm. In the 81 countries with e-waste policies, one of the most frequently applied principles is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), ensuring manufacturers contribute to proper waste disposal

Route 2: A significant portion of e-waste is mistakenly discarded with regular household trash. Without proper segregation, these items often end up in landfills or incinerators, releasing hazardous substances such as lead, mercury, and cadmium into the environment.

Route 3:  In some countries with advanced waste management, e-waste is still collected outside formal programs by independent collectors. However, due to the presence of structured recycling facilities, these collectors may sell the devices to authorized recyclers, ensuring a portion of the waste is properly processed.

Route 4: Many developing nations lack structured e-waste legislation or collection programs. Instead, self-employed individuals gather e-waste directly from consumers, often using unsafe methods such as burning or acid baths to extract valuable materials. These practices pose serious health and environmental risks.

4. Transboundary Movement

The transboundary movement of e-waste remains a growing issue, with large amounts of discarded electronics crossing borders, often without proper regulation. Many developing countries receive shipments of used electronics, some of which are functional, but a significant portion consists of end-of-life devices that are improperly disposed of. According to the Global Transboundary E-waste Flows Monitor 2022, around 3.3 million metric tonnes (Mt) of e-waste were transported through uncontrolled channels in 2019. This lack of oversight allows e-waste to end up in informal recycling operations, where hazardous substances are released into the environment. Meanwhile, only 1.8 Mt of e-waste was moved under proper regulations, ensuring safe processing.

Source: https://ewastemonitor.info/gtf-2022/

5. Economic Assessment

E-waste collection and recycling are challenging due to the high initial costs of setting up proper infrastructure, including collection points, transportation, and advanced recycling technologies. Many stakeholders, particularly in developing regions, hesitate to invest due to the perception that costs outweigh financial returns. However, this short-term view ignores the long-term benefits, such as reducing environmental damage, preventing health risks from toxic waste exposure, and recovering valuable materials like gold, silver, and rare earth metals. Effective economic policies, including Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, government incentives, and public-private partnerships, can help shift the focus from upfront costs to sustainable long-term gains, making e-waste management more financially viable.

What are some practical solutions? 

Effective e-waste collection requires accessible infrastructure and well-designed systems to encourage proper disposal. Here are some key approaches to enhance e-waste collection and management:

  • Expanding Collection Points – Establishing designated e-waste drop-off locations in malls, supermarkets, and electronics retailers increases convenience for consumers and ensures proper disposal.
  • Mobile Collection Units – Deploying trucks or vans to collect e-waste directly from neighborhoods can improve collection rates, particularly in areas with limited access to permanent drop-off sites.
  • Incentivized Returns – Offering financial incentives, such as discounts or trade-in credits, encourages consumers to return old devices rather than discarding them improperly. Programs like Apple’s trade-in initiative demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
  • Automated Sorting & Processing – Advanced mechanical and robotic systems can efficiently disassemble e-waste, allowing for better recovery of valuable materials while reducing manual labor and exposure to hazardous substances.
  • Smart Collection Systems – IoT-enabled bins equipped with sensors can monitor fill levels and optimize collection schedules, reducing inefficiencies and improving waste management. 
  • Tracking and Accountability – Implementing GPS tracking and blockchain-based systems can enhance transparency in e-waste management, preventing illegal dumping and ensuring that materials are processed responsibly. IBM’s e-waste blockchain pilot is an example of how digital tracking can improve accountability.

References: who.int, britannica.com, reecollabb.com, weee4future.eitrawmaterials.eu, ewastemonitor.info, ibm.com